Compare the Ways in Which Expected Roles Were Determined

Compare the ways in which pass judg macrocosmpowert single-valued functions were laid by sexual practice in Journeys depot and The Accrington Pals. To what extent would you agree that Accrington Pals presents a to a greater extent presumable image than Journeys End. A large proportion of bang-up fight literary works suggests that manpower were socially seen as the superior g repealer nonwithstanding women were given opportunities to prove themselves in a masculine-dominated society as a by-product of state of strugglefare. This essay will compare the issues of gender identity and roles at the figurehead verge in R.C Sheriffs Journeys End and the impact war had on women who stayed home in Accrington, seen in Peter Whelans The Accrington Pals during 1914 and 1918. Journeys End appears to be a to a greater extent credible turn because of Sheriffs first-hand experience of the war, w here(predicate) as The Accrington Pals depicts the much(prenominal)(prenominal) s timulated side of war. R. C Sheriff uses Stan anticipate as an in-personity of how war affected girlish, intelligent and naif men and video display the reality of war. Stanhope is the received male of WW1. He is the image of authority, condition and patriotism.He is as well thought incredibly highly of from the cut game ranks. Hes a long way the best companion commander weve got. It seems as though men were in the war for a long time but the reality universe that the death rate of British officers was higher(prenominal) than that of the lower ranks with the average life prevision of an officer mankind cardinalteen days. The newsworthiness long thus creates irony within the drama. From the beginning of the drama, we are enlightened of Stanhopes experience and dedication to his duty, however, Stanhope could be seen as a contradictory figure.His heavy drunkenness and reliance on alcohol whitethorn be a sign of weakness, which could besides present Sheriffs us e of realism in the drama. Stanhope is far from reluctant to admit he has a drinking problem. With come forth being do drugs with whisky- Id go wan with fright. Sherriffs testify experience whitethorn put one over been reflected on in this dialogue as men at war used to seek comfort in things in order to avoid fright. It is seeming(a) that this is the reason for Stanhopes excessive drinking. pursuit comfort in something seen as criminal by society is also regular of Ralph from The Accrington Pals who seeks contentment whilst away from his girlfriend, Eva Mason.At the beginning of the play, Ralph expresses love, rawness and admiration for Eva clever woman Eh? Brains , which is why it seems disappointing when Ralph admits he has been unfaithful to her in whilst away at war, seen in the extract, Ive been a bastard to you Eva, if only you knew. Slept with whores. Ralph, being a regular(prenominal) representation of a working partition citizen suggests that war empennage turn even the most reputable man to adultery in the depend for comfort. It is almost as if Whelan sympathises with the fragility of men because of their previous innocence, dreadful war and their apparent flaws.Through the use Stanhope and Ralph as characters the audience construe the expectations traind on men because of their class. Stanhope, being from the high rank in the army is ultimately granted respect from the lower ranks, whilst Ralph in The Accrington Pals was from a lower class citizen and in a lower rank, and then the reason for C. S. M Rivers arrogance and neediness of respect we dont insufficiency you shooting yourself in the head. C. S. M Rivers does non think Ralph is capable of the things man does in war, simply because of his class.The patriotic character of Stanhope in Journeys End compares with tom Hackford from The Accrington Pals, who illustrates comradeship end-to-end the entire drama. Despite his description in the preface being that he is a drea my, utopian intellectionlist young man, he does not seem typical of the average man of the war as he appears almost as a young boy, not k straightawaying the horrific reality of what is to come. He is very utilize to his future duty as a solider and seems excited to fight for his country, although this is not in the interest of whitethorn, who describes war with thats a world you love isnt it.As an audience, we gain an insight to turkey cocks reasons for volunteering. This is ironic because he understands that he is soon to die but he describes signing up as a way to escape from Accrington for something new excuse of here, of this place, of this town. Being such a collectivist creature it can only be disappointing that war has limited opportunities for the male gender as many of the young men who signed themselves up such as turkey cock and Ralph whom had no idea of the reality of the trenches because of government censorship. gobblers frenzy to his obligation is apparent b y dint ofout the drama, as seen in his letter he writes to may in scene two. I hope you dont mind me manduction it as we do all the parcels here Comradeship is proven as he shares his luxuries with the Pals. I hope you dont mind me sharing it. Even most to his death, Tom still concentrates on sticking with one another to get finished the war. The ideologies of Tom contrast to those of may Hassel, who is exposit from the outset of The Accrington Pals as a strong-minded, wiped out(p) individualist woman. The entrepreneurial spirit displayed through Mays independence and the leaders motive of the iron lady, suggest the advantages war gave women. Whilst the men are absent from Accrington, May is left focused on exploiting the chances now available, making her appear arrogant and frigorific hearted. May obsesses with business ideas and opts to making property out of the war. I never believed that war would nock a difference corresponding this. Theres money slightly.The indiv idual attitude and the drive to make money is not typical of the womanish gender role, therefore May does not present the normal values the coeval audience are expecting from a woman. The Accrington Pals suggests the more emotional side of war for women, showing the eventual downfall of May caused by the lack of male influence within war shaped society, however does inflect Mays developing as an individualist. The absence of Tom seems the reason for Mays change. Her development during the play into a more conventional and sensitive women (as seen in scene four act one).The change in Mays character can be seen when she offers to make the tea. She seems more lenient and positive. In The Accrington Pals, it is arguable that May Hassal conforms to the role that is often portrayed of women in the First World War taking on the everyday roles of men man they were away. This expectation has been shown to us through literature from the time, such as Emmeline Pankhursts narrative which gives the proof that feminism was now a feature of Edwardian existence.May suggests this as she is shown to be an individualistic, entrepreneurial tartar (seen in colloquy between the Pals). In this sense, however, May is shown to be more masculine, and has seemingly swapped roles with Tom who becomes more feminine. This can be determined by the labels that May gives him, such as i wadist. However, these gender roles are once over again returned to typical trends of society by the end of the play when May becomes feminised by Toms death. This seems to be portrayed as almost chaotic, and heroic.Rivers says, But our Tom was a hero , a madcap nominal head ripping his way out of the wire Toms death, while bestow a sense of masculinity back to Toms character role, also gives us a sense of singular femininity in May reversal her to the underlying fact that she is a female. throughout the drama, May is often shown to be the ratty hearted, aggressive character yet Toms death lea ds her to act out in a more emotional, feminine way and expresses her sorrowed emotions. This is comparable to Stanhope and capital of North Carolinas kindred in Journeys End.Both are emotionally connected, and have been for a long time, yet the onetime(a) character, Stanhope, treats Raleigh as both an foreigner and a stranger for the majority of the play, harangue down to him and criticising him largely. Stanhope says in one case Dyou understand an order? control me that letter . In many ways, the relationship shared by Stanhope and Raleigh is similar to that of Tom and May the older and more experienced character doubts the abilities and maturity of the younger, more innocent individual therefore restrain the care that is expressed between them.Just as with May, Stanhope openly expresses his emotions during the death of Raleigh, showing a return to the Stanhope that was described by Raleigh earlier in the play a hero, an idol, who cared for him. Stanhope gently takes his hand. Stanhope expresses a great deal of care for Raleigh in his lowest moments of life and attempts to make his death as comfortable as possible. This seems to show range for him as a person per-war as well as a wear solider. This is similar to how May expresses her sorrow for Toms death in The Accrington Pals.To terminate this essay, the gender of a person seems to manipulate the role they played during World War One. Men were expected to fight for their esteem and country whereas women were expected to stay at home and support infants and households. Each role is an act of protection. Whether it was staying at home in Accrington, or fighting at the front in Journeys End, a place in society was inevitably determined by gender. Journeys End was written from the personal perspective of R. C. Sherriff, so is more believably to be based on his own experiences of the war.It is very likely that Sherriff witnessed the discussed gender roles and identities as part of the reality of war, adding to the credibility of the factual based play. His work seems to be severely based on gender hegemonies given(predicate) of the Great War era bighearted extra depth and dimension to the truth of War. However one must not forget Peter Whelan wrote The Accrington Pals when the war was over, therefore using information and experiences from historical evidence. Although this may be a more move opinion, in my opinion the real life experiences of R. C. Sherriff creates a far more credible and powerful piece of literature.